The electronics industry changes so rapidly that new technology inevitably becomes dated or obsolete soon after release. The latest smart phones soon take their place in attic storage along side boxy personal computers, old high-end CD players and tiny flip-phones. On average, consumers generate nearly twenty pounds of electronic garbage each year, and Dallas e-waste processing can help them recycle it responsibly.
It is no secret that many electronic components include toxins. Prior to flat screen displays, bulky cathode ray tubes needed barium, a toxic metallic element also necessary for some automobile parts and lighting elements. Circuit boards often contain cadmium, harmful to kidneys and bones. Lead, chromium, and mercury are also common in used electronics, usually surrounded by structural plastic that neither burns nor decomposes.
The public is well-informed about the need for recycling, but that awareness has had little impact on the growing presence of e-waste. It is common for manufacturing companies to have no officially expressed policy regarding ultimate disposal, and even environmentally progressive bodies such as the European Union can account for less than one quarter of the electronic garbage generated. United States figures go even lower, and much of that is exported for metal extraction.
In an idealized economic world, electronics manufacturers would take responsibility for recycling what they produce, and in some cases that is actually occurring. In Texas and some other states, television and computer makers are required to offer free-of-charge services for their customers, and to publicize those efforts. Although many companies are eager to participate, others insist that the problem is demand, not supply.
Even the most environmentally-aware consumers may not be able to discover the real destination of their recyclables. A growing number of services provide free pickup, mass collection rallies or events are popular, and a growing number of charitable organizations solicit old equipment for re-purposing. Much of the material has traditionally ended up in poorer countries with their own e-waste issues, including worker exposure to toxins.
Once the garbage has been removed, there are few real assurances that it will not end up becoming part of a greater problem. Some receiving countries face such extreme poverty that they willingly trade environmental degradation in exchange for hard currency. In wealthier nations, local recycling programs that are the least costly to operate over time may not be the best long-term solution.
In an effort to increase transparency and public trust, some disposal firms are seeking certification through independent agencies. Although some states currently fine companies for infractions, no uniform national laws governing e-waste processes currently exist on a national scale. While the proliferation of pickup and removal programs is helpful for consumers, few controls govern the final destination.
People residing in Austin increasingly choose a recycling company that is willing to openly explain how the disposal process works, and whether the material is being internationally transported. Some firms have adopted tracking systems that follow individual shipments closely, including the final destination. This not only helps control environmental pollution, but also offers better protections for workers involved in the recycling effort.
It is no secret that many electronic components include toxins. Prior to flat screen displays, bulky cathode ray tubes needed barium, a toxic metallic element also necessary for some automobile parts and lighting elements. Circuit boards often contain cadmium, harmful to kidneys and bones. Lead, chromium, and mercury are also common in used electronics, usually surrounded by structural plastic that neither burns nor decomposes.
The public is well-informed about the need for recycling, but that awareness has had little impact on the growing presence of e-waste. It is common for manufacturing companies to have no officially expressed policy regarding ultimate disposal, and even environmentally progressive bodies such as the European Union can account for less than one quarter of the electronic garbage generated. United States figures go even lower, and much of that is exported for metal extraction.
In an idealized economic world, electronics manufacturers would take responsibility for recycling what they produce, and in some cases that is actually occurring. In Texas and some other states, television and computer makers are required to offer free-of-charge services for their customers, and to publicize those efforts. Although many companies are eager to participate, others insist that the problem is demand, not supply.
Even the most environmentally-aware consumers may not be able to discover the real destination of their recyclables. A growing number of services provide free pickup, mass collection rallies or events are popular, and a growing number of charitable organizations solicit old equipment for re-purposing. Much of the material has traditionally ended up in poorer countries with their own e-waste issues, including worker exposure to toxins.
Once the garbage has been removed, there are few real assurances that it will not end up becoming part of a greater problem. Some receiving countries face such extreme poverty that they willingly trade environmental degradation in exchange for hard currency. In wealthier nations, local recycling programs that are the least costly to operate over time may not be the best long-term solution.
In an effort to increase transparency and public trust, some disposal firms are seeking certification through independent agencies. Although some states currently fine companies for infractions, no uniform national laws governing e-waste processes currently exist on a national scale. While the proliferation of pickup and removal programs is helpful for consumers, few controls govern the final destination.
People residing in Austin increasingly choose a recycling company that is willing to openly explain how the disposal process works, and whether the material is being internationally transported. Some firms have adopted tracking systems that follow individual shipments closely, including the final destination. This not only helps control environmental pollution, but also offers better protections for workers involved in the recycling effort.
About the Author:
Read more about How Dallas E-Waste Processing Centers Are Combating A Growing Problem.
